The News is Dead

I have been in a conversation with a friend over the benefits (and drawbacks) of living without television. (Disclaimer: we have a television and can watch movies, but we have no cable, satellite, or even an antenna.)

Our conversation migrated into the merits (or lack thereof) of “news.” I was turned off television news when Diane Sawyer told me about a plane crash with a gleam in her eye. (No, really, she described a plane crash into a Florida office building as a “fascinating” story. She had to hurry and cover her gaffe by adding, “and tragic.”)

Now news outlets on the internet have gone the same way: all gossip and sensationalism, and rarely anything of real interest. I’ve gotten to the point that I rarely check MSN anymore because I don’t often read the articles. And this morning offered a fine example why I should never bother again.

Top news stories for April 11, 2012 at 9:20 AM:

  • Eliminations on “Dancing with the Stars” and “The Voice”
  • Housing: What can you buy for $200k, $500k, or $1 million
  • Arkansas fires Petrino after wreck and misdeeds (apparently this man is their football coach)
  • Under-20 Celebs with sophisticated style
  • Best of spring style from East to West
  • Why do we hand politicians babies?
  • Earthquake in Indonesia; North Korea prepping for rocket launch; Santorum drops out of race

There you have it folks–what passes for news on a major online news outlet: television reviews, articles on houses the vast majority of Americans can’t afford, a sports scandal, two articles on fashion, an inane question which no one wants to know the answer to, and one–ONE–spot in seven for things which people actually consider news: natural disasters, warlike overtures by a hostile nation, and a notable change in the political landscape.

Here are the editor’s picks:

Other prominent news stories include:

Pardon my language for a moment, but no other word will do: Who gives a fuck?

Zip lines in Vegas? Who the hell is Tony Romo and why do I care? Dressing like celebrities? Yeah, I really want to take fashion tips from the likes of these people.

It used to be that people read the newspaper to learn things. But what passes for “news” today not only doesn’t teach you anything, but you have to be lacking in a certain amount of intelligence to even enjoy reading it.

I will admit, when I first heard about blogging, I scoffed. Who wants to read a bunch of hack-jounralists’ editorials or details on someone’s boring, everyday life? I even hated the word “blogging.” It had a ring of idiocy to it.

Now, a decade later, I find that blogs are a better source of news than places which are paid to disseminate it. At least most bloggers openly admit their leanings–be that liberal, conservative, tea party, black, white, male, female, gay, straight, religious, atheist, etc. You can make an informed decision whether you want to read only those things which agree with your world view, only those things which oppose it, or a combination of both.

News outlets, however, try to maintain the illusion of impartiality while subtly imparting their leanings to their readers. (The exception being Fox News, which is unapologetically conservative.) I find this more dangerous because your views can be swayed without your knowing it, and without you having the option to read something which presents the opposite view. There’s a difference between choosing not to study the other side and not studying the other side because you don’t realize there is another side.

And these “hack-journalist” bloggers actually seem to do a better job at investigative reporting than major news outlets. From Wikipedia:

An early milestone in the rise in importance of blogs came in 2002, when many bloggers focused on comments by U.S. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott.Senator Lott, at a party honoring U.S. Senator Strom Thurmond, praised Senator Thurmond by suggesting that the United States would have been better off had Thurmond been elected president. Lott’s critics saw these comments as a tacit approval of racial segregation, a policy advocated by Thurmond’s 1948 presidential campaign. This view was reinforced by documents and recorded interviews dug up by bloggers. (See Josh Marshall’s Talking Points Memo.) Though Lott’s comments were made at a public event attended by the media, no major media organizations reported on his controversial comments until after blogs broke the story. Blogging helped to create a political crisis that forced Lott to step down as majority leader.

Similarly, blogs were among the driving forces behind the “Rathergate” scandal. To wit: (television journalist) Dan Rather presented documents (on the CBS show 60 Minutes) that conflicted with accepted accounts of President Bush’s military service record. Bloggers declared the documents to be forgeries and presented evidence and arguments in support of that view. Consequently, CBS apologized for what it said were inadequate reporting techniques (see Little Green Footballs). Many bloggers view this scandal as the advent of blogs’ acceptance by the mass media, both as a news source and opinion and as means of applying political pressure.

The impact of these stories gave greater credibility to blogs as a medium of news dissemination. Though often seen as partisan gossips,bloggers sometimes lead the way in bringing key information to public light, with mainstream media having to follow their lead. More often, however, news blogs tend to react to material already published by the mainstream media. Meanwhile, an increasing number of experts blogged, making blogs a source of in-depth analysis.

[Emphasis mine.]

Bloggers are “partisan gossips?” Scroll up to the list of MSN stories that I share and see if that comment can’t also be applied to major news outlets.

4 comments on “The News is Dead

  1. Wallace says:

    I was going to comment on other matters about your post, but the current news on TV is a prime example of how worthless the TV news channels have become. North Korea has fueled up and is about to launch a rocket capable of putting a satellite of up to 1400 pounds into orbit. An orbit that will send it over most of the inhabited world.

    This very same satellite could be a weather satellite or a 10 megaton thermonuclear hydrogen bomb. And a 10 megaton nuclear bomb, airburst over the central US could provide an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) capable of destroying all the electronics and electric power transmission facilities in the US and parts of Canada and Mexico. An EMP burst of that size would leave the US crippled for 12 to 24 months as the entire electrical grid is rebuilt.

    And what is CNN and the rest of the 24 hour news stations doing? CNN is giving nearly 100% of their coverage to talking about the murder of one man in Florida. MSNBC is giving nearly all of their coverage to the Republican War On Women. And FOX is talking about Mike Wallace and the political bias in news reporters. Meanwhile, the North Koreans, avowed enemies of the US, are preparing to launch a satellite of up to 1400 pounds into orbit, an orbit that will take it over the US several times a day, and none of the 24 hour news services seem in the least interested.

    If there was some actual breaking news, or some new facts that just came to light, I might see giving some coverage to these other matters, but all the news channels are doing is just talking about old facts and what they may or may not mean in some future scenarios that they then make up on the spot. They can’t comment reliable on a trial that hasn’t even started yet. They can’t comment on Republican policies that may never be implemented. They can’t comment reliably on things that are just their opinions of other people. Everything they are talking about is just supposition and conjecture with so few actual facts that the facts, if any, could be quickly stated in a couple of minutes. Everything else they are talking about is just what ifs that are not likely to come true.

    I rather doubt the North Koreans actually have a 10 megaton nuclear bomb. They can’t make one and it would be very unlikely they could buy one from some disgruntled general in a former Soviet Union country, and even less likely Russia or China would give them one, but there is the slim chance of them putting something in orbit that may prove to be detrimental to the US. If so, I’d like to see some actual coverage of the launch, some analysis of the lifting power and trajectory of the rocket, and some plotting of the satellite’s orbit around the Earth. At the very least, I’d like to know if the North Koreans actually got their satellite in orbit at all, or did it blow up on the launch pad or fall into the ocean. Seems with coverage like this, I’ll have to wait till somebody who actually cares about US security actually looks into the matter.

  2. Wallace says:

    And it turned out the NK rocket broke up in the air after launch. The NK are calling it a triumph since it took off and left NK, while the rest of the world calls it a failure since it just crashed.

Leave a Reply to Wallace Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s